A Psych For Sore Minds: An Interview with Forensic Psychiatrist Dr Sohom Das


Q. if you have made an analysis of psychological disease in a defendant, what’s the process for evaluating simply how much influence that condition had in defendant’s offenses? I imagine that is simpler in many cases than others, but very complex for identifying unlawful obligation and guidelines into court?

SD – this can be about carefully analysing all of the readily available proof in extreme information for clues towards defendant’s mind-set and intentions. Becoming a forensic psychiatrist just isn’t quite because attractive as it appears. For almost any hour that i will be assessing a defendant in jail or offering proof in courtroom, I probably invest around 6 to 7 hours simply sifting through files of research and medical notes and writing up reports. I invest much more amount of time in coffee shops than i really do in the experience stand.

Another aspect is the fact that the threshold for a person to be not culpable with their criminal behavior (such as the psychiatric defences of ‘not accountable by explanation of insanity’ or ‘diminished responsibility’) is clearly quite large. The legal requirements location additionally very certain. Or in other words, someone are floridly psychotic (e.g. hearing sounds or suffering intense paranoia), yet still have actually unlawful culpability. In this scenario, they nevertheless might be transferred to medical center in place of jail if they’re acutely unwell. As an alternative, they could involve some leniency inside their sentencing or offer a residential area phrase with circumstances of hospital treatment. Regardless of this, they nevertheless might be officially culpable into the eyes for the law.

Q. As an expert witness in criminal studies, your assessment and conclusions about an offender and any diagnosis has a significant effect on their fate. This is certainly plenty of obligation to carry with a great deal weight fond of your testimony. Will it be difficult to be certain of an analysis sometimes and how would you deal with that trouble if testifying in courtroom?

SD – i might state that more often than not, the diagnosis is obvious cut. Once again, looking into each defendant’s health background is half the struggle when it comes to making an accurate analysis.

Around one fourth of cases are far more complex for a number of reasons; lack of readily available health notes, the defendant is both perhaps not cooperating or may be malingering or just there are numerous intertwined psychological infection dilemmas. In these trickier situations, it is critical to be definitely balanced and honest toward legal. If you will find diagnostic grey places or doubts, We get this amply clear within my proof that We give. I would say that there’s a spectrum of reasonable conclusions and emphasize in which on that range my views lie. It’s also essential to consider that my views are given on stability of possibilities.

I see some psychiatrists have a problem with this. They could be narrow-minded, stubborn and unbalanced in their views. They sometimes insist that only their final conclusions is proper. They’re the individuals just who get torn to shreds during cross-examination from opposition barrister while the judge and, i must say, it does provide me a tiny bit of enjoyment to witness this (!)

Furthermore really important to know our part. This is certainly only to assist the Criminal Court realize difficult psychiatric issues by which it generally does not have expertise, and I do. It’s not to convince the legal of every particular viewpoint. It can be an intimidating situation to be cross-examined by judges or intense barristers, whose job it is to cast question on my opinions. However, it is not essential for us to have to be appropriate. It really is only important to guide the Court such that it make its very own choice. Forensic psychiatrists need keep our egos within door – which is simpler for many people than others!

Q. Handling mentally disordered offenders in prison seems to be an extremely hard location. With these types of an array of characters, mental health states and unlawful records all combined in a single jail populace, just how hard can it be to identify needs and supply therapy under these scenarios?

SD – Really.

It’s understandable the environment of prison itself can trigger or exacerbate psychological diseases; not merely reasonably conventional ones like anxiety and depression, but also the rarer conditions like schizophrenia or mania. It’s no secret that psychological infection and character condition tend to be rife in jail.

A major challenge is just the work for most psychological state In-Reach Teams in prisons. There are a continuing stream of prisoners coming through rather than adequate people in staff to see them. It is scarcely surprising with funding deficits both in the mental health and criminal justice methods.


Find Out More: The Challenges Faced By A Prison Psychiatrist | Dr Sohom Das | Huffington Post


The possible lack of resources spills into areas. For example, most prisons have actually a Healthcare Unit, which can be a bit like a psychiatric ward within a prison. They’re staffed by nurses and doctors while the prisoners are considered every day. They will have access to help and treatment, particularly regular medication and mental treatment. This is an infinitely more peaceful, medical and healing environment compared to the jail wings. But the bed areas tend to be limited and cannot match the increasing number of mentally ill prisoners. In another of the prisons where i’ve formerly worked, all the beds had been full almost all enough time, and thus extremely ill inmates must overspill into the jail wings.

Another salient issue is the waiting lists to move very sick inmates to secure psychiatric units. Many prisoners are deemed is also risky and dangerous for basic psychological state wards. Rehabilitation in these protected units can be a slow and hard process; usually, customers are detained within these units for a couple many years, sometimes even much longer. Which means that the release rate and return of these units is extremely low. As a result lengthens their waiting list. There clearly was usually a backlog of psychotic prisoners who desperately need medication as well as other treatment.

Another problem is insufficient back ground information. Frequently, whenever prisoners arrive, we’ve no usage of their health records. This makes it challenging to make diagnoses, as we have only a snapshot of these existing presentation.

Mental illness is certainly not always apparent or linear; some symptoms are subdued or can alter as time passes. I’ve seen a number of prisoners have been paranoid due to psychotic experiences and remained inside their cells. They hardly interacted with individuals, so they really didn’t also visited the interest associated with prison mental health team for months. Classic situation of ‘the squeakiest wheel gets the grease.’

More, you will find prisoners which fabricate or lie about symptoms with the purpose of either being used in a psychiatric device, for medication, or just to go wings. Some psychiatric medication can provide you a ‘buzz’. They are usually made use of as prison currency. Therefore unsurprisingly, some inmates do just about anything getting their on the job this.

Q. How often do you really see defendants that you will need to fabricate emotional disease and just how simple is it for you yourself to spot?

SD – This occurs fairly frequently. Sometimes, they are also exaggerating real symptoms. It is actually relatively easy to identify. It is because emotional health problems generally slowly develops with time. It is uncommon (though maybe not impossible), for somebody in order to become floridly psychotic very quickly. Therefore, we research each defendant’s health background; scouring through old medical records. Likewise, we examine unbiased research about their psychological state during the time of the offense (via witness statements, police interview transcripts and CCTV video footage, etc) and I also search for any inconsistencies from what they’re reporting themselves.

Another issue is the defendant’s agenda. A person who is truly psychotic or unwell generally is very guarded and paranoid. It can take many energy and digging around to elicit these refined symptoms. But someone who is feigning since they wanting to go to medical center (example. in the hope the judge drops the charges) will attempt and force it. They are going to typically try to convince myself that they are unwell.

It’s about knowledge. I’ve assessed well over a thousand defendants. Just a little percentage were seriously mentally unwell. I am aware just what this looks like and doesn’t appear to be. I’ve developed a reasonably effective BS radar. Thank goodness for me, some offenders are not especially great stars. However, i must say that really sporadically i actually do get caught away; there have been several cases where I have been duped.


[embedded content]

Q. The location of unlawful legislation for diminished obligation appears rather a complicated and confusing defense. It really is a partial psychiatric security, but how does that actually work, and what would your part be in these instances?

SD – Diminished obligation downgrades a murder fee to manslaughter. In England, murder is a necessary life sentence, whereas the sentencing for manslaughter is completely on Judge’s discretion; they are able to choose life imprisonment, or launch the defendant or any anything in the middle.

This is exactly the type of situation that i’m instructed to cope with; I check all offered proof and complete a “Mental State Examination’ associated with accused. I patch together their particular mental state, their particular idea processes and their particular intentions during the time of the offense. I then match it towards the really certain appropriate requirements for Diminished obligation. It needs intimate familiarity with psychiatry and of the law. The former is straightforward in my situation; i have already been learning this industry for several years. The latter is much more challenging; I’ve must read across the subjects and also have chosen it with knowledge.


Get the full story: Peter Sutcliffe the YORKSHIRE RIPPER incl. Diminished Duty | 13 | Dr Das is A PSYCH For Aching Thoughts


Q. I’m interested in learning when a significant criminal activity has been dedicated during a drug-induced psychosis additionally the defendant doesn’t have a brief history of mental condition. Just how would you start your evaluation in an incident like this? And how tough can it be to determine criminal culpability in such cases?

SD – the initial step is differentiating these situations from a severe relapse in somebody who suffers from a recurrent psychosis, such as for instance schizophrenia. This will be all about timing; a drug-induced psychosis only lasts while the illicit substances are in the defendant’s system (for example. two or three days) and it resolves in an instant (i.e. without medicine). A relapse of persistent psychosis will last weeks or months and only improves with anti-psychotic medications. Often, I delay the assessment by a day or two, to see the trajectory of this data recovery.

It can also help to learn if as soon as the topic used medications and which type; some substances are more prone to cause drug-induced psychosis than the others (e.g. amphetamines do, opiates don’t). Occasionally, it really is pretty obvious. They’re going to acknowledge it themselves, or a person who is near them and worried about their state of mind will report it. But there are occasions when I do not have understanding. The authorities don’t execute urine medication screens on all suspects. Even when they do, some substances don’t arrive in these tests; including, the newer synthetic cannabinoids.


Discover more: FORENSIC PSYCHIATRIST describes DIP | 6 | Drug Induced Psychosis | Dr Das | A Psych For Aching Minds


Criminal culpability is very difficult in cases of drug-induced psychosis. If defendant was merely intoxicated, after that obviously there isn’t any psychiatric defence during their criminal test. If that were the outcome, after that many individuals would attempt to get away with countless offences from the foundation they had been squandered! However, if it was either involuntary intoxication (e.g. if their drink ended up being spiked) or if perhaps they flipped into real drug-induced psychosis (for example. they certainly were away from touch with truth), after that this could possibly reduce their particular criminal culpability. For me personally which will make that telephone call, I have to examine most of the readily available proof carefully. It is in view of identifying just what their mental state during the time. We study experience statements, police interview transcripts and CCTV footage. I seek out proof psychosis (particularly hearing sounds or paranoid delusions). The limit to not have unlawful culpability (e.g. a defence of ‘not guilty by explanation of insanity’) is very large. I only get this to situation for a minority of instances.

Q. How will you rehabilitate mentally disordered offenders? Is it about managing their particular psychological disease, getting control of their symptoms then consequently attempting to address their criminal offending and behavior?

SD – If they are actively mentally sick, defendants are transferred to safe psychiatric products; i’ve worked on a number of these in my profession. They usually have additional degrees of security, eg double-locked magnetized doors and a perimeter fence. They also have seclusion areas to accommodate many agitated and disturbed customers.

The first step, while you state, is dealing with their particular symptoms using medication, including anti-psychotics. Usually, these customers have actually complex and trenchant psychosis and sometimes require numerous medicines at high doses. Healing usually takes almost a year or longer. Then we additionally instigate psychological therapy, such as for example relapse avoidance also assisting the customers find out the group of situations having contributed for their offending in the past (such illicit medicine use or anti-social colleagues). Drug and alcoholic beverages rehabilitation is another key factor.

We in addition track the patients’ behaviour and boundary breaches (psych-speak for ‘rule-breaking’) on the ward; this really is an illustration of their total amount of danger. Once they show constant stability and engagement in treatment, we start testing them on leave. Normally escorted with nurses initially and eventually unescorted. All leave is structured and meaningful. Leave is rescinded if circumstances tend to be broken.

Eventually, work-related treatments are a vital location. This includes educational programs, voluntary work or accumulating abilities for future employment. This massively improves the patient’s odds of enduring locally after ultimate discharge; whether they have employment and a lifetime career, they have been less prone to get back into crime and less likely to want to relapse inside their psychological disease.

Many thanks Dr Das for responding to all my questions and providing us these types of amazing understanding of your projects! You are able to meet Sohom Das in person at CrimeCon London 2021.


Crime Traveller is a proud news lover of CrimeConUK
Two amazing true crime week-end events in London and Austin, June 2021. More info and tickets at crimecon.co.uk and crimecon.com/CC21.
Quote CT21 for a 10percent rebate!

Latest posts